Dear Jérémy and Sarthak,
You asked for three things in addition to the positioning project I recapped via email: a piece of writing, two sentences on what I'd change about how Favikon shows up, and one sentence on why this role. I decided to answer all three at once, on this page.
Here’s what I’d change about how Favikon shows up publicly:
Start with what the buyer is trying to get right, not what Favikon does.
Boldly say the one thing only you can say.
↓
Start with what the buyer is trying to get right…
Picture the marketer you're selling to in the decision moment. The creator's been selected, the budget's approved, and right before they commit, they begin to doubt. Is this audience real? Is this creator right for us? Am I about to spend money and time on a post that flops?
The fix is to write every top-line message from inside that moment, and let Favikon be the reason they don’t need to worry.
…and boldly say the one thing only you can.
The current hero leads with what Favikon does: search, vet, manage, report.
My suggested version leads with a point of view, not a feature. A point of view is the thing a crowded category can't copy. Competitors might match a feature list, but they can't take your stance without sounding like they're quoting you.
It’s simple, but it’s a big positioning differentiator for Favikon.
Why this role?
In one sentence, I'm a positioning-obsessed PMM.
Longer: I love research. I spend my days diving into customer and prospect calls, mapping the competitive landscape, and dreaming up (and then creating) assets for my team to use.
My PMM work has helped close deals and launch features, and changed the perception of products both internally and externally.
I can tell Favikon has a clear vision of what needs to be done, and it’s work I want to own.

